The sleeper hit of the Summer is “The Help,” which topped the box office in its second week and has already grossed over seventy million dollars. The adaptation of Kathryn Stockett’s novel about African-American maids working in white Southern homes in the 1960s has received good reviews too. Despite this, I have seen lots of criticism on Twitter (and around the Blogosphere) calling the film racist. So what’s the deal with this film? Is it worthwhile or actually racist? In my opinion, the angry tweets I’ve read have failed to pinpoint the real reason the film has so many people up in arms.
I’m not sure if everyone knows this, but film is a big love of mine, so much, in fact, that I first moved to Los Angeles to attend the University of Southern California Film School. I was knee deep in foreign films and the auteur theory when, about halfway through my first semester, a girl I went to high school with named Temi came to town and arranged a dinner with the four or five of us from our high school who were attending college in Los Angeles.
Temi wasn’t like any other girl at our high school. She was smart as a whip (I’m pretty sure she was our valedictorian or salutatorian or something -torian), and so committed to womyn’s rights (as she spelled it) that she refused to wear a bra or shave her legs. I was pretty impressed by how fervently Temi stood for what she believed, and had a bit of a crush on her. (Full disclosure: my crush may have also had something to do with the fact that she was pretty good looking.)
Unfortunately Temi DID NOT have a crush on me. I was a loud teenage boy into baseball, pepperoni pizza, and explosion packed summer movies, and she fantasized about college boys who were vegetarians and read Erica Jong.
Anyway, at this high school reunion dinner of sorts Temi talked about how sexist American films were, and – likely in an effort to impress her – I launched into a big spiel about how I was going to make films that had complex, interesting female leads. Temi told me that was great, but emphasized that that wasn’t the answer to solving sexism in American film. “You’re a man,” she said, “And you shouldn’t feel shame about writing from the male experience. You have the right to tell your story. But so do women. The answer isn’t for men to portray women more truthfully, but for Hollywood to allow women to make movies that tell their story too.”
I have no idea what happened to Temi (she isn’t on Facebook…the horror!), but I still remember what she said that night. It was a sage observation, and one that can be applied to the controversy surrounding “The Help.” “The Help” dramatizes the civil rights’ era from the perspective of a white woman who grew up in the South amidst all of the turmoil, and her story has resonated with a lot of people. And, to paraphrase Temi, Kathryn Stockett shouldn’t feel shame for writing about the civil rights era from her experience.
What IS a shame, and the thing that is really upsetting so many people I think, is that Hollywood so rarely allows African Americans to make movies that tell their story. For every “Malcolm X,” a civil rights era drama directed by an African-American told from the perspective of an African American, Hollywood makes a dozen movies about a strong white person who heroically stands up against racism like:
MISSISSIPPI BURNING – where two white FBI agents fight to solve the murder of three civil rights workers in Mississippi.
THE POWER OF ONE – where a white English boy dedicates his life to fighting for the rights of blacks in Africa.
THE LONG WALK HOME – where a white woman stands up against racism when the Great Bus Boycott makes it impossible for her black maid to get to work.
And many, many more.
This lack of diversity in Hollywood films is the problem, I think. If “The Help” was released among many films about the civil rights era told from many different perspectives (of both sexes and different races), I doubt so many people would have had a problem with it. But hey… that’s just the perspective of this former film school schmo who still loves pepperoni pizza, baseball, and explosion packed summer movies.
Maura says:
The first post on this topic that I agree with completely.
I would extend this thought to include the fact that people shouldn’t be made to feel bad about enjoying the movie for what it is, and not simply for what it isn’t.
Lilly says:
Very well put. I’ve been trying to find the root of the angry tweets as well.
Leigh Elliott says:
Very well written as usual Mike. I think it’s wicked cool (we say “wicked” to accentuate somethings ‘coolness’ in New England) that you and Heather both have such a gift to write.
I have read “The Help” and enjoyed the book very much, and I am going to see the movie this week as well. I really loved the book. Have you read the book?
I really appreciate the point you have brought up about how so many times this is what ‘Hollywood’ tends to force feed us these similar viewpoints through film. Even though the book is written by a white woman, and the fact that I am also white, I felt that the voices in “The Help” were some of the most genuine I have ever read.
Thanks for another great post.
Kona says:
Thank you! I wrote a review of “The Help” called “Benevolent White Folks Save the Day,” http://cliqueclack.com/flicks/2011/08/10/the-help-movie-review/ which basically sums up my views of the film.
NOBODY else seems to agree with me though. I was starting to think I was crazy because everyone I know has seen the movie and loved it, while I thought it was kind of offensive and borderline racist (albeit with brilliant performances from a fantastic female cast who deserve every Oscar nomination they are sure to get).
Brooke says:
I read the book but have not seen the movie yet. It’s wonderfully written and I don’t think it’s racist at all. I think if anything you side with the maids and share their struggles and feel their pain and share in their joy.
Thanks, Mike for bringing this up. I wondered after reading the book how the movie would be accepted.
Jackie says:
I haven’t seen the movie but I don’t think the book is racist. In the book the white woman compiles the experiences of the black maids into short stories from their point of view, thus giving them a voice. How can that be racist? I hope they didn’t adapt the movie in a way that made it racist.
Kona says:
That’s the problem. The book takes great pains to show that the women had the strength within themselves all along. In the movie, the maids get their strength from white people. Plus the pervasive fear that is in the book is not in the movie at all – everything is lighter and frothier.
DefendUSA says:
I loved the book, “The Help”. Having grown up in the North with a lot of black Nannies around-none of them mine and although not the south, the one thing that resonates is the fact that most of the time, they were never treated as “The Help.”
It would provide great perspective as you say if there were more diverse approaches to movies and not just the “rich” interpretation of the directors buying stories and making them the way they see it.
meoskop says:
Those black nannies might feel differently. I know several nannies today where the employers think they are ‘just like family’ and the nannies strongly disagree.
Here is one perspective – http://www.beforebarack.com/2011/07/28/sniffing-dirty-laundry-a-true-story-from-“the-help’s”-daughter/
Amber says:
I’m apparently an idiot. I read the book when it first came out and have yet to see the movie.
Never did I think it was racist. I’m still baffled that people are all up in arms about it.
I guess I took it at face value and didn’t read much else into it. Oh well.
Susan says:
Amber, I completely agree with you. For better or worse, Mississippi in the early 1960’s was not a good place for African-Americans. Period. This book simply tells a story, and the backdrop of Mississippi and the Jim Crow laws, are another character. Whether we like to admit it or not, those terrible things really happened.
Enjoy the book and the movie for what it is – women who did what they thought was best for their situations.
Adrianne says:
I’m with Amber. I read the book, loved it, had a great book club discussion about it, but haven’t seen the movie yet. However, I have heard a lot of people call the movie racist, and it kind of makes me feel bad. Like maybe I’m a bad person because I didn’t pick up on how it could be offensive to others.
I still don’t think I see the book that way (though our book club did discuss the fact that it was written by a white woman and did that make a difference), but I’m anxious to see the movie this week to see how I feel about it. I just hate that I’m going into it with so many opinions already and therefore might not really develop my own.
Amber says:
This was pretty much how I felt. I read the books MONTHS ago and then recently have been reading/hearing the chatter about how racist it was.
Oops, maybe it makes me racist that I didn’t see it that way? Not sure but like you I’m still not sure I think it was racist. I felt like it was a story about the history of America at the time.
And let’s face it racism is still alive and well. If you don’t believe me then just pay a visit to MS now. I’m sure you will find it without much difficulty.
Debbie says:
In THAT time period, it wasn’t racist; it was just the way things were. But in this day and age it would be racist, because that’s not the acceptable way anymore. Have to keep in mind though – the book and movie are from that decade, not this one.
Lazlo Panaflex says:
I concur. Hollywood portrays itself as the leader in promoting diversity and acceptance but is it? Many films don’t think twice about portraying a racial stereotype or mocking gays in order to cut a script corner or get a cheap laugh. Hollywood”s defense…”It’s just a few seconds of a 120 minute movie”. If movies had no impact…nobody would see them. It’s all cumulative, it all has weight.
Kelly says:
I don’t think that the overall impression given by this story is one of the white girl as savior. By and large, the white characters in the story are either horribly cruel or they are ignorant sycophants. I felt it was the maids who risked everything who were portrayed as the heroes … and rightfully so. Skeeter was merely a vehicle for them to get their story out to the world. Was it racist that they even needed the help of a white woman to tell their story? Maybe, but I think it was also probably more historically accurate because, let’s face it, what big time publisher (populated almost entirely by white people) at the time would be likely to even give the time of day to a group of black maids from Mississippi? Just my two cents.
Brandi says:
This book (and movie) opened my eyes to a time and a struggle that I, myself, didn’t live through. Although we all “know” about it, I have never ready anything that tried to tell me the story so vividly. I found it very enlightening–it made me so very angry to think that, not all that long ago, these things were happening. I don’t find the book racist at all. I have a feeling she did a great job of depicting exactly what these black women and families went through. If anything, I would imagine it might be a bit sugarcoated even. I find it funny that people are calling the book racist. She writing about a time in which racism was rampant, of COURSE it’s racist. But it tells the story of what they went through, it doesn’t glorify how they were treated, and it shows how valuable they were to these families (whether they admitted it or not!). I don’t see it as “the white girl saving the day”, but more as black women standing up for themselves and for each other and using the source provided to tell their story. In the end of both the book and the movie, I felt that the black women won way more than any of the white characters. They did something they were proud of and, from what I could tell, that wasn’t something that came easy back in those days. Just my two cents. I know people have really different views of the book/movie, but I found it entertaining, enlightening, very amusing at times and heartbreaking at others. And, while it was fiction, if even a 10th of it was historically accurate, it makes me proud of the strides our country has taken in regards to this and it makes me hopeful that we will continue those strides to make this place a wonderful place for all of us to live.
Kona says:
I don’t think anyone is calling the book racist at all. The issue is the movie and how it’s kind of a terrible adaptation that doesn’t capture the nuance or the pervasive fear that is so apparent in the book.
Kristin says:
VERY well said Brani
Kristin says:
Brandi, sorry.
Kristin says:
I am currently reading this book and I love it. Seriously can not put it down. I’m really surprised to hear that people find it racist. Apparently these people have not read the book. I don’t know how in the world it could be considered racist when it tells a story from the point of view of the maid herself and the white woman who doesn’t really agree with how the maids are treated. The book is beautifully written and really touches how how a lot of “the help” felt back then. It is surprising to me to read about all they had to endure from the white people all while they were raising the children and really LOVING the children. Can’t wait to see the movie, but I know it will never be as good as reading the book.
Heather B. says:
These are the most hilarious comments ever. EVER.
Mike is right, it’s another book/movie about how a white woman saves the poor blacks and totally disregards the severity of Jim Crow laws and that at the same time blacks were actually helping themselves. Also, notice how in the book all of the black women have a very distinct ‘dialect’ meanwhile Skeeter doesn’t? That translates into the movie as well.
The book and movie aren’t racist but they aren’t exactly the best telling of life in the 1960’s south.
Molly says:
Hear, hear!! White ladies (including myself) have to stop wanting to tell stories with black people in them that are really only about *us*. See: The Blind Side, The Secret Life of Bees, Gone with the Wind. You know, black ladies have really great and interesting things to write and say about their own lives (Toni Morrison, Alice Walker, Audre Lorde, and more)–maybe it’s time we listened!
Lisa says:
I read the book but have not yet see the movie, though I intend to. I’ll say that I really enjoyed the book until I made the unfortunate mistake (for me) of reading the “blurb” about the author inside the jacket. For reasons I couldn’t quite understand then, but that are becoming more clear to me after having read this post, I was disappointed to discover that she was white. That’s all I’m going to say.
Katie says:
I haven’t seen the movie, but I loved the book. I am looking forward to the movie though! I just need some free time…
I think it’s important to remember that this particular book is the story of these black women told through a white woman’s point-of-view. This is not a white author writing as though it were a black woman’s point-of-view.
It’s also important to remember that the 60’s in Mississippi were definitely full of racism – blatant and hateful. Some of that is sure to come through this book – it has to if it wants to remain as authentic as possible.
From what I understand about this author, she grew up in Jackson, and experienced a life much like Skeeter’s. I think a lot of the stories from this book are pulled from her life – or at least influenced heavily by it.
I don’t say all of this to debunk your point – it is a valid one for sure. I just think The Help (the book anyway) won’t fall under this category. Just my 2 cents!
Sherry says:
Haven’t read the book, and haven’t seen the movie (yet…seeing it tomorrow night) so it’ll be interesting after hearing all these opinions, what take I get from the movie. Maybe I should also read the book…
Noelia says:
I think reading the book will give you a better understanding of things that aren’t too clear in the movie…
Lisa says:
I actually cringed when I saw this was a post on The Help, but you wrote something that I agree with completely and that is something I think I was feeling but not understanding that I felt. Right on. Right on, Mike, right on, Temi.
Linda says:
I’ve read the book and seen the movie. I hope this comes out like I intend, so here goes. Of course it’s racist…how could you tell a story set in that era in the South about those issues and it not be? That being said, it’s also a needed story to see what life was like then. I think it shows that while we have come a long way…we still have much further to go. It was very disturbing to see people being treated that way no matter their color and I truly believes that is what is bothering a lot of people.
Kona says:
There’s a big difference between portraying racist events and being racist in the portrayal of those events. The movie isn’t racist because the black maids were treated unfairly by their white employers; it’s racist because it diminishes the maids and exalts the “good” white characters.
Take Minny for example: in the book, she finds the strength to leave Leroy from within herself. Was it facilitated by finding her voice through the stories she told Skeeter? Yes, but the strength still came from within. In the movie, it took Celia’s fried chicken to give Minny the strength to leave Leroy. Her strength came from outside instead of from her.
Becky says:
Movie version of Minnie still finds her strength within herself. Eating Celia’s fried chicken didn’t magically give Minnie the courage to leave Leroy. The fried chicken is symbolic – it symbolizes all the growth and change Celia experienced because of Minnie’s help and influence. Seeing and eating the chicken causes Minnie to recognize that she was the force that brought about good for Celia and also causes her to realize she can do the same things in her own life. It still comes from within but movies can’t allow for the same character development and character arc that books do. Therefore, it needs to be shown visually and symbolically. Clearly eating a piece of Celia’s chicken didn’t magically change Minnie’s life.
Lisa A says:
This is a great analysis of the movie. I loved the book and love the movie, but for the story that’s at heart. Yes, it may not be perfect in the eyes of everyone, but if the experiences are true (and the book is much more detailed than the movie, of course) then I have to think there is at least some good in the fact that they’re being told. I do agree that Hollywood needs to wake up and bring some diversity to the screens.
Al says:
a lot of people seem to have a problem with the (sometimes) typical portrayl of white woman saving the day for the “black folk.” But there was really no other way for the maids to tell their story but through a white woman. I really liked how the book put Skeeter in the background after “The Help” came out; it was like she had served her purpose and the maids had to go back to living their lives. I haven’t seen the movie yet but I probably will once I don’t have to pay $15 to see it!
Rose says:
I know this is beside the point, but The Power of One is an amazing and inspiring book and the film adaptation was completely wrong and nothing like the book. I was so sad after seeing that mess of a film I cried! I can highly recommend the book though
Shaynee says:
I have not seen the movie, and I confess that I did not think much of the book. The premise was so engaging, but the execution simply fell flat. It felt like something written to be a Hallmark special, skimming over the surface even when it was touching on weighty topics and tense situations. Stories from that era need to be told. This one did not deliver for me.
Liz says:
I have to agree with Mike and Heather B. (commenter above). I have not read the book. I was given the book on CD though, and my husband (who is African American) and I (white) are thinking about listening to the story with our two children. I have heard multiple reviews of the book, though, and I am mildly interested in the book.
As my husband pointed out, similar to Mike’s opinion, that this story is not this white woman’s story to tell. Why in Hollywood do we feel it is necessary to only have one culture’s point of view? I tried to convey this message to my Aunts that loved the book and raved about it. They complained about the ideas that it could be racist and I noted that it wasn’t this woman’s story to tell. Their response? Well, who is going to tell it if she doesn’t? Ha!
Do people really believe that if a white person doesn’t tell the story, that it won’t be told? There is a reason why so many groups complain about how, for example, there is little to no representation of people of color in movies and TV. (My husband and I are always excited to point out when a biracial couple is in a commercial – which is extremely rare) They are not being allowed! And when you do see them, it is usually in a stereotypical role.
Just my honest opinion.
LD says:
I think that your husband (and you) hit the nail on the head. It’s the biggest reason that I won’t read the book and the reason I was kind of uncomfortable watching the movie. I think it goes back to the issue of who has the ability to speak. I mean, you could compare the Help to something like Morrisson’s The Bluest Eye. In that book there are also African American Nanny figures, but it’s a very, very different take on the situation.
saralema says:
Excellent commentary on the issue- the first I read that actually made me understand the uproar over it beyond a superficial level. Thank you!
Christina says:
Did you see the bit on Jon Stewart about this? “Aren’t white people wonderful?” It was good! I completely agree with this perspective. The film shouldn’t apologize for what it is but we should all take this opportunity to remind ourselves that there are too many films from the perspective of the dominant culture (or gender or sexual orientation, etc.) and not enough from the other perspectives. What is the most offensive and hurtful of all is that the films that are not from the dominant group’s perspective don’t do well in the box office.
Christina says:
Did you see the bit on Jon Stewart about this? “Aren’t white people wonderful?” It was good! I completely agree with this perspective. The film shouldn’t apologize for what it is but we should all take this opportunity to remind ourselves that there are too many films from the perspective of the dominant culture (or gender or sexual orientation, etc.) and not enough from the other perspectives. What is the most offensive and hurtful of all is that the films that are not from the dominant group’s perspective don’t do well in the box office.
**Sorry if this posts twice… browser problems.
Brittani says:
It was supposed to be racist. It was supposed to be how it really was back then between the two groups.
aqua6 says:
Here’s the clip from Jon Stewart, where John Oliver “helps” Wyatt Cenac explain recent events, and “loves the Help movie a little too much”.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-august-17-2011/indecision-2012—elephant-stampede-to-the-white-house—black-clouds—red-herrings
Ray says:
“But so do women. The answer isn’t for men to portray women more truthfully, but for Hollywood to allow women to make movies that tell their story too.”
Temi sounds like a smart woman. ;o)
That is the problem in “Hollywood.”
There aren’t many woman directors, or more movies with African American’s in it, or Hispanics, etc (for that matter). And if there is: It’s a nauseatingly-over-used-stereotypical role written by a Caucasian person (no offense to Caucasian’s, but they are the ones who mostly own the Film World, so to speak. Mainstream, anyhow. And mainstream is what the majority of people love to watch. Whether it’s garbage/washed out movies that have been recycled millions of times, and are still out there up to bat, even though most movies will only get 1 ½ to 2 stars approval when they end up on television, or not. What I wouldn’t give for my own television network, to give everyone a great reprieve to the tired, outdone and boring), who thinks they have it right, but don’t.
But that’s the film world for you. Until one of us stands up and changes/challenges it, they, them, the world.
I haven’t seen, “The Help” yet. I’ll probably check it out when it comes out on television. So I can’t say if it has any flaws or not, in regards to racism.
Sorry for the rant!